|
作者
|
內容
|
|
morrie
|
Posted -
2009/1/12 下午 11:18:06
|
|
|
324. If the priest notices after the consecration or as he receives Communion that not wine but only water was poured into the chalice, he pours the water into some container, then pours wine with water into the chalice and consecrates it. He says only the part of the institution narrative related to the consecration of the chalice, without being obliged to consecrate the bread again.
324. 若於祝聖聖體聖血後，或在領受時，司祭發覺注入聖爵的是水，而不是酒，則把水倒入另一容器，將酒注入聖爵，加入少許水，再行祝聖；只念主晚餐敘述中祝聖聖血部分，而毋須再祝聖聖體。
為何會有這樣的安排？
|
|
simon
|
Posted -
2009/1/13 下午 10:35:42
|
|
|
那很合理啊。神父只是弄錯了酒，再祝聖時，當然是把酒祝聖就成了。
|
|
Paulus
|
Posted -
2009/1/14 上午 12:26:55
|
|
|
我認為很少出錯, 因酒與水的顏色是不同.
|
|
ernst
|
Posted -
2009/5/20 上午 08:56:03
|
|
|
I don't think it's clear enough at the GIRM on handling such situations.
You could take reference to the "De Deféctibus" of the 1962 Roman Missal Instruction.
God Bless
|
